Text Size:


  1828 L Street, NW
  Suite 801   Washington, DC 20036
  (P) 202.332.2275
  (F) 202.332.2949

Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act 2008

Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act 2008

Support the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act of 2008!

S. 2641

 

Congress is considering the most important nursing home legislation in 20 years. Two of Congress’s leading supporters of nursing home reform, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Ranking Republican on the Finance Committee, and Senator Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, Chairman of the Special Committee on Aging, have introduced S. 2641, the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act. A companion bill is expected soon in the House of Representatives.  

 

NCCNHR has worked with congressional staff to develop the legislation, which would increase transparency of nursing home ownership, operations, staffing, and expenditures; improve the consumer complaint process; increase civil monetary penalties; and expand public information about nursing home quality, including penalties and staffing levels.

 

 

About S. 2641

Leadership Council Supports S. 2641

NCCNHR Supports the Act

Why Consumers Support the Act

Grassley and Kohl Request Colleagues' Support

New York Times: At Many Homes, More Profit and Less Nursing

 

 

About S. 2641

 

Text of S. 2641

 

Act Fact Sheet

 

Summary of Major Provisions of the Act

Improve transparency and accountability in the ownership and operations of nursing homes

Corporations would be required to disclose their owners, operators, financers, and other related parties. Facilities that were part of chains would be required to submit annual audits. Purchasers would have to demonstrate that they were financially able to run facilities.

 

Require disclosure of how Medicare and Medicaid funds are spent

Providers would have to report wage and benefit expenditures for nursing staff on cost reports. Cost reports would be revised to categorize spending for direct care, such as nursing and therapies; indirect care, such as housekeeping and dietary services; capital costs, including buildings and land; and administrative costs, which often include the company’s profits.

 

Establish independent monitoring of chains 

The federal government would develop a protocol for an independent monitor of chains to analyze their financial performance, management, expenditures, and nurse staffing levels. It would provide for corrective action and collection of civil monetary penalties.

Collect accurate information about nurse staffing

The government would collect data electronically from nursing homes on the number of RNs, LPNs, and nursing assistants, using payroll records and contracts with temporary agencies as the source. Data would include turnover and retention rates and hours of care per resident provided by each category of worker.

 

Provide better public information about nursing homes

Nursing Home Compare would be updated with more timely reporting of surveys; ownership information; accurate nurse staffing data, including turnover and retention rates; links to survey reports (Form 2567) when states put them online; enforcement actions; and all Special Focus Facilities identified for three years. The government would undertake a study on how to improve the website to make it more useful and understandable.

 

Implement new consumer complaint processes

The government would develop a standardized form consumers could use in filing complaints with the state regulatory agency or ombudsman. States would be required to establish a complaint resolution process for residents’ representatives who were retaliated against, including denied access to residents, if they complained about quality of care or other issues.

 

Provide for higher civil monetary penalties and other CMP reforms

Federal civil monetary penalties would be increased for the first time since the 1987 Nursing Home Reform Act – up to $100,000 in the case of a resident’s death. Fines would be held in escrow during appeals of deficiencies, no longer delayed until appeals were resolved. Federal CMP funds, which are now returned to the U.S. Treasury, are encouraged to be used for the benefit of residents.

 

Provide for reporting of closures and continuation of federal payments

Nursing homes would be required to give 60 days notice of closure, including a relocation plan and assurances that residents would be transferred to the most appropriate facility or other setting. No new residents could be admitted after the notice was given, and the federal government could continue Medicare and Medicaid funding for residents until relocation was completed.

 

Authorize studies of temporary management; special focus facilities; culture change; and nurse aide training

The bill provides for studies of temporary management; the characteristics of Special Focus Facilities, including ownership; best practices in culture change; and training of nurse aides and supervisors. Dementia management would be added to the initial 75-hour nurse aide.

 

Leadership Council Supports S. 2641

Read the Leadership Council on Aging's (LCAO) letter of support.

NCCNHR Supports the Act

Read NCCNHR's bulletin about the Act.

Read NCCNHR's letter of support to Senator Chuck Grassley.

Read NCCNHR's letter of support to Senator Herb Kohl.

Senator Herb KohlSenator Herb Kohl

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senators Chuck Grassley and Herb Kohl, Bill Sponsors

 

 

Why Consumers Support the Nursing Home Transparency Act

Learn why consumers support S. 2641.

 

Grassley and Kohl Request Colleagues' Support

Letter to Colleagues from Grassley and Kohl

Letter Attachment - Act Highlights

 

New York Times: At Many Homes, More Profit and Less Nursing

New York Times Investigation: At Many Homes, More Profit and Less Nursing




About NCCNHR | Membership | Citizen Groups
Staff | Board Members | State Ombudsmen | Ombudsman Resources
Contact Us | Home

Copyright © 2001-2008 NCCNHR, all rights reserved. Click here to view our privacy statement